An insurance company that addresses counties and other community entities in Idaho suggests it will not renew Canyon County’s insurance policy coverage because of escalating dangers and a significant quantity of claims.
The Idaho Counties Chance Administration Program, acknowledged as ICRMP, despatched a letter to Canyon County officials on May perhaps 23, citing “numerous variables such as adverse assert improvement and raising possibility exposures,” the Idaho Press claimed. The Nampa-based mostly newspaper acquired the doc as a result of public records requests.
Canyon County Community Details Officer Joe Decker reported the county’s elected officials couldn’t straight away comment simply because the predicament is onging.
“We are doing the job to consider all possibilities, like possible renewal with ICRMP and the probable acquisition of substitution protection,” Decker wrote in an e-mail. “More facts will be forthcoming when accessible.”
Canyon County Commissioners responded to ICRMP in a June 2 letter that proposed the county may well attraction the non-renewal discover. They took difficulty with the non-renewal selection, expressing, “the abruptness and comprehensiveness of this complete separation, and the deficiency of warning or chance to cure any perceived situation, is shocking.”
The commissioners also explained the insurance company’s documentation showing the county’s “loss history” was not precise. They mentioned 25 of the promises stated are “unrelated to the county.”
They also stated the insurance policies enterprise was equating so-named “nuisance settlements” — typically made when an entity decides that paying out an individual to close a lawsuit would be more affordable or much more convenient than preventing the matter in court — with actual misconduct by the county or its representatives.
Tim Osborne, government director of ICRMP, claimed in a phone job interview that he could not elaborate on the factors that the board voted to non-renew the coverage. He mentioned his office is performing to coordinate a meeting with Canyon County officials to evaluate the “documentation” of the motives the board voted to non-renew. Soon after that meeting, Canyon County officials could ask for a assembly with the board in open session about how to move forward, he claimed.